
OpenText Core Application Security
Runtime application self-protection (RASP) software
Static code analysis tools
Dynamic application security testing (DAST) software
Interactive application security testing (IAST) software
Application security software
DevSecOps software
- Features
- Ease of use
- Ease of management
- Quality of support
- Affordability
- Market presence
Take the quiz to check if OpenText Core Application Security and its alternatives fit your requirements.
Contact the product provider
Small
Medium
Large
-
What is OpenText Core Application Security
OpenText Core Application Security is an application security testing platform used to identify and manage vulnerabilities across the software development lifecycle. It supports common AppSec workflows such as scanning applications and tracking findings for remediation by development and security teams. The product is typically used in DevSecOps programs to integrate security testing into CI/CD pipelines and governance processes. It is positioned as part of OpenText’s broader security portfolio, with emphasis on centralized vulnerability management and enterprise reporting.
Broad AppSec testing coverage
The product is designed to support multiple application security testing approaches rather than a single technique. This helps teams apply different methods to different risk areas (for example, code-level issues versus runtime behavior). It can reduce the need to stitch together separate tools for basic scanning and findings management. This is useful for organizations standardizing AppSec across many teams.
Enterprise workflow and reporting
It supports centralized handling of findings, including triage and remediation tracking across applications and teams. This aligns with governance needs such as audit readiness, risk reporting, and program-level metrics. Centralization can improve consistency in how vulnerabilities are prioritized and closed. It also helps security teams manage AppSec at scale beyond individual project tooling.
Fits DevSecOps operating model
The product is commonly deployed to integrate security testing into development workflows rather than running only as a periodic security assessment. It is intended to support automation and repeatability in CI/CD contexts. This can shorten feedback loops for developers and reduce reliance on late-stage testing. It also supports standardization of security controls across pipelines.
RASP/IAST depth may vary
Although the product is associated with multiple testing categories, organizations should validate the depth of runtime and interactive testing capabilities for their specific languages and frameworks. Some environments require agent-based instrumentation or specific runtime conditions that are not universally available. Coverage gaps can lead teams to supplement with additional runtime-focused tooling. Proof-of-concept testing is typically necessary to confirm fit.
Tuning and triage effort
Like many application security testing platforms, results quality depends on configuration, rulesets, and ongoing tuning. Teams may need to invest time in reducing noise, establishing baselines, and defining severity and SLA policies. Without mature triage processes, findings backlogs can grow quickly. This can slow adoption among development teams if the signal-to-noise ratio is not managed.
Integration complexity in practice
Integrating AppSec scanning into diverse CI/CD pipelines, repositories, and issue trackers can require non-trivial setup and maintenance. Enterprises with many tech stacks may need custom workflows, credential management, and environment-specific configurations. This can increase operational overhead compared with narrower, single-purpose tools. Ongoing administration is often required to keep integrations aligned with pipeline changes.
Seller details
OpenText Corporation
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
1991
Public
https://www.opentext.com/
https://x.com/OpenText
https://www.linkedin.com/company/opentext/