Pull Reminders
Peer code review software
DevOps software
Source code management software
- Features
- Ease of use
- Ease of management
- Quality of support
- Affordability
- Market presence
Take the quiz to check if Pull Reminders and its alternatives fit your requirements.
$24.99 per organization per month
Free Trial unavailable
Free version
Small
Medium
Large
-
What is Pull Reminders
Pull Reminders is a lightweight tool that sends reminders about open pull requests to help teams keep code reviews moving. It targets software teams using pull-request-based workflows who want automated nudges in chat or email rather than a full DevOps or repository hosting platform. The product focuses on reducing review latency by monitoring pull request status and notifying reviewers or authors based on configurable rules. It typically complements an existing source code hosting system rather than replacing it.
Focused on review follow-up
The product addresses a narrow, common bottleneck: pull requests waiting for review or updates. By concentrating on reminders and escalation, it can be deployed without changing the underlying repository workflow. This focus can make it easier to adopt than broader platforms that bundle planning, CI/CD, and hosting.
Works alongside existing SCM
Pull Reminders is positioned as an add-on to an existing source code management and pull request system rather than a replacement. That allows teams to keep their current repository host, permissions model, and branching strategy. It can fit into environments where the core platform is standardized but review responsiveness varies by team.
Configurable notification rules
Reminder tools typically provide rule-based triggers such as age of PR, missing reviewers, or lack of activity. This supports different team norms (e.g., stricter SLAs for production services, looser for internal tooling). Rule configuration can reduce manual chasing by engineering managers and tech leads.
Not a full DevOps suite
Pull Reminders does not replace end-to-end DevOps capabilities such as CI/CD pipelines, artifact management, issue tracking, or release governance. Teams still need separate systems for build, deploy, and broader lifecycle management. This can increase the number of tools to administer compared with consolidated platforms.
Limited SCM functionality
As a reminder-focused product, it does not provide core source code management features like repository hosting, merge controls, or advanced access governance. Organizations must rely on their existing SCM provider for audit logs, branch protections, and compliance controls. The overall review process quality still depends on the underlying platform’s review features.
Vendor details not verifiable
Publicly verifiable information about the product’s owning company (legal entity, founding year, headquarters, and official social profiles) is not consistently available from authoritative sources. Without clear vendor attribution, procurement due diligence and security reviews can be harder. Buyers may need to confirm ownership, support channels, and data handling directly with the publisher.
Plan & Pricing
| Plan | Price | Key features & notes |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 per organization | Daily or weekly reminders only; one summary per day for stale PRs (>24h); all repositories → single channel; custom thresholds; repo-specific routing |
| Team | $24.99 per organization / month | Everything in Free; custom thresholds per repo or globally; repo-specific channel routing; quiet hours/business hours; order by oldest first; priority support |
| Enterprise | $74.99 per organization / month | Everything in Team; escalation (ping creator + manager/team lead after N reminders); analytics dashboard (stale PR trends, avg review time); multiple channels per repo; priority support + higher rate limits |
