
PullRequest
Peer code review software
DevOps software
Source code management software
- Features
- Ease of use
- Ease of management
- Quality of support
- Affordability
- Market presence
Take the quiz to check if PullRequest and its alternatives fit your requirements.
$129 per developer per month
Small
Medium
Large
- Information technology and software
- Media and communications
- Professional services (engineering, legal, consulting, etc.)
What is PullRequest
PullRequest is a peer code review service and platform that helps engineering teams obtain structured reviews of pull requests, often using external reviewers in addition to internal team members. It is used to improve code quality, enforce review standards, and provide feedback on changes before merge. The product typically integrates with common Git-based repositories and pull request workflows and adds review management, reviewer assignment, and reporting around review activity.
External reviewer network option
PullRequest supports augmenting in-house reviews with on-demand, third-party reviewers. This can help teams handle review backlogs or add specialized expertise without hiring full-time staff. It is particularly relevant for teams that need consistent review coverage across time zones or during peak delivery periods.
Fits existing PR workflows
The product is designed to work with pull request-based development rather than replacing the underlying repository hosting. This reduces disruption for teams already standardized on Git-based tooling. It also makes adoption easier because developers can continue using familiar repository and PR interfaces while adding a managed review layer.
Review process visibility
PullRequest adds workflow controls and reporting around review requests, turnaround time, and completion. This can help engineering leaders monitor review throughput and identify bottlenecks. The focus on review operations differentiates it from broader DevOps suites that bundle many functions beyond code review.
Not a full SCM platform
PullRequest is not primarily a source code management system and does not replace repository hosting, branching administration, or end-to-end CI/CD features. Organizations still need a separate system for repo management and pipeline execution. This can increase vendor count compared with consolidated DevOps platforms.
Value depends on integrations
The usefulness of PullRequest depends on the depth and reliability of integrations with the organization’s repository and identity stack. If an integration is limited, teams may experience duplicated work (e.g., managing reviewers or statuses in multiple places). Integration constraints can also affect auditability and reporting completeness.
External review governance needs
Using external reviewers can introduce additional governance requirements around access control, data handling, and confidentiality. Some organizations may require strict controls for regulated codebases or sensitive IP, which can limit where and how the service is used. Procurement and security reviews may add lead time before rollout.
Plan & Pricing
| Plan | Price | Key features & notes |
|---|---|---|
| Team | $129 per developer per month (billed annually) | Secure human-led code review; median ~90-minute turnaround; Smart Review Selection; AI-identified security hotspots reviewed by humans; Access to network of expert reviewers; Code quality and review metrics; Integrations with GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, and Bitbucket Cloud; Premium Customer Success; Two-week trial available. |
| Enterprise | Custom pricing | Contact sales for custom solutions; flexible plans and faster SLAs; custom POCs; on-premise installation & support for GitHub/GitLab/Azure DevOps; SAML SSO; API access; Premium Customer Success and support. |
Seller details
PullRequest, Inc.
Unsure
Private
https://www.pullrequest.com/
https://x.com/pullrequest
https://www.linkedin.com/company/pullrequest/