
Aqua Security
Cloud compliance software
Cloud-native application protection platform (CNAPP)
Cloud security monitoring and analytics software
Cloud security posture management (CSPM) software
Cloud workload protection platforms
Container security tools
Software composition analysis tools
Vulnerability scanner software
Risk-based vulnerability management software
Cloud security software
DevSecOps software
Software bill of materials (SBOM) software
Vulnerability management software
- Features
- Ease of use
- Ease of management
- Quality of support
- Affordability
- Market presence
Take the quiz to check if Aqua Security and its alternatives fit your requirements.
Contact the product provider
Small
Medium
Large
- Manufacturing
- Information technology and software
- Retail and wholesale
What is Aqua Security
Aqua Security is a cloud-native security platform that helps teams secure containerized and Kubernetes-based applications across the build pipeline and runtime. It is used by security and DevOps/DevSecOps teams to identify vulnerabilities and misconfigurations, enforce policies, and monitor workloads in cloud environments. The platform combines container and Kubernetes security, vulnerability scanning and prioritization, and posture/compliance capabilities into a single product suite. It also supports artifact and image scanning workflows that integrate with CI/CD and registries.
Broad CNAPP capability coverage
The product spans multiple cloud-native security functions, including container/Kubernetes workload protection, posture/compliance checks, and vulnerability management. This breadth can reduce the need to deploy separate tools for build-time scanning and runtime controls. It fits organizations that want a consolidated approach rather than stitching together point solutions. The platform aligns well with cloud-native operating models that standardize on Kubernetes and container registries.
Strong container and Kubernetes focus
Aqua is designed around container images, registries, Kubernetes clusters, and related runtime controls. It supports common workflows such as scanning images before deployment and applying policy gates in CI/CD. Runtime protections and policy enforcement are oriented to cloud-native workloads rather than traditional endpoint-only models. This specialization is useful for teams with high container density and multiple clusters.
DevSecOps and pipeline integrations
The platform is commonly deployed as part of CI/CD to scan artifacts and enforce security policies before release. It supports automation patterns that help shift security checks earlier in the development lifecycle. This can improve consistency across teams by using shared policies and standardized scanning steps. It is suited to organizations that need repeatable controls across many repositories and services.
Complexity and operational overhead
Because it covers multiple security domains, implementation can require careful planning around policies, exceptions, and ownership between security and platform teams. Tuning rules and prioritization often takes time to reduce noise and align with risk tolerance. Organizations with limited cloud security engineering capacity may find rollout and ongoing administration demanding. Smaller teams may not use enough modules to justify the full platform footprint.
Best fit for cloud-native stacks
The strongest value is in container and Kubernetes-centric environments, so organizations with significant legacy VM-only or on-prem workloads may see less benefit. Coverage for non-containerized application patterns can require additional tools or different controls. Teams early in their cloud-native adoption may not be ready to operationalize runtime policies and cluster-level enforcement. This can delay time-to-value compared with simpler posture-only tools.
Licensing and module alignment
Capabilities are typically packaged across modules, and the best outcomes often depend on adopting multiple components together. This can create procurement and budgeting complexity when teams only need a narrow subset (for example, scanning only). Cost and scope decisions may require mapping features to internal responsibilities (AppSec vs CloudSec vs Platform). Organizations should validate which features are included in their chosen edition and how usage is metered.
Plan & Pricing
Pricing model: Usage-based / subscription Billing metrics (as stated on Aqua official site):
- Dev Security: pricing based on number of code repositories.
- Cloud Security: pricing based on number of workloads (AWS EC2 instances, Fargate containers, Lambda functions, etc.).
Free tier/trial (official):
- Developer Plan: According to Aqua's SaaS EULA, after a limited evaluation period the account is converted and automatically renewed under Aqua’s Developer Plan ("free of charge").
- Evaluation Period: Aqua's EULA states a 14-day Evaluation Period for trial (with possible extension at Aqua's discretion).
Public unit prices / example costs on vendor site:
- No public per-unit prices, tiered dollar rates, or subscription fees are published on Aqua's official pricing page. Customers are directed to request a trial or demo / contact Aqua for pricing details.
Notes & official references:
- Aqua’s public pricing page describes the pricing basis (repositories, workloads) and directs users to Request a Trial / Get Demo but does not list dollar amounts or public plan tiers on the page.
- The EULA (Aqua SaaS) explicitly documents the 14-day evaluation and the Developer Plan conversion (free of charge) after the trial end, unless a commercial subscription is purchased.
Seller details
Aqua Security Software Ltd.
Ramat Gan, Israel
2015
Private
https://www.aquasec.com/
https://x.com/aquasec
https://www.linkedin.com/company/aqua-security-software-ltd/