fitgap

Aqua Security

Features
Ease of use
Ease of management
Quality of support
Affordability
Market presence
Take the quiz to check if Aqua Security and its alternatives fit your requirements.
Pricing from
Contact the product provider
Free Trial
Free version
User corporate size
Small
Medium
Large
User industry
  1. Manufacturing
  2. Information technology and software
  3. Retail and wholesale

What is Aqua Security

Aqua Security is a cloud-native security platform that helps teams secure containerized and Kubernetes-based applications across the build pipeline and runtime. It is used by security and DevOps/DevSecOps teams to identify vulnerabilities and misconfigurations, enforce policies, and monitor workloads in cloud environments. The platform combines container and Kubernetes security, vulnerability scanning and prioritization, and posture/compliance capabilities into a single product suite. It also supports artifact and image scanning workflows that integrate with CI/CD and registries.

pros

Broad CNAPP capability coverage

The product spans multiple cloud-native security functions, including container/Kubernetes workload protection, posture/compliance checks, and vulnerability management. This breadth can reduce the need to deploy separate tools for build-time scanning and runtime controls. It fits organizations that want a consolidated approach rather than stitching together point solutions. The platform aligns well with cloud-native operating models that standardize on Kubernetes and container registries.

Strong container and Kubernetes focus

Aqua is designed around container images, registries, Kubernetes clusters, and related runtime controls. It supports common workflows such as scanning images before deployment and applying policy gates in CI/CD. Runtime protections and policy enforcement are oriented to cloud-native workloads rather than traditional endpoint-only models. This specialization is useful for teams with high container density and multiple clusters.

DevSecOps and pipeline integrations

The platform is commonly deployed as part of CI/CD to scan artifacts and enforce security policies before release. It supports automation patterns that help shift security checks earlier in the development lifecycle. This can improve consistency across teams by using shared policies and standardized scanning steps. It is suited to organizations that need repeatable controls across many repositories and services.

cons

Complexity and operational overhead

Because it covers multiple security domains, implementation can require careful planning around policies, exceptions, and ownership between security and platform teams. Tuning rules and prioritization often takes time to reduce noise and align with risk tolerance. Organizations with limited cloud security engineering capacity may find rollout and ongoing administration demanding. Smaller teams may not use enough modules to justify the full platform footprint.

Best fit for cloud-native stacks

The strongest value is in container and Kubernetes-centric environments, so organizations with significant legacy VM-only or on-prem workloads may see less benefit. Coverage for non-containerized application patterns can require additional tools or different controls. Teams early in their cloud-native adoption may not be ready to operationalize runtime policies and cluster-level enforcement. This can delay time-to-value compared with simpler posture-only tools.

Licensing and module alignment

Capabilities are typically packaged across modules, and the best outcomes often depend on adopting multiple components together. This can create procurement and budgeting complexity when teams only need a narrow subset (for example, scanning only). Cost and scope decisions may require mapping features to internal responsibilities (AppSec vs CloudSec vs Platform). Organizations should validate which features are included in their chosen edition and how usage is metered.

Plan & Pricing

Pricing model: Usage-based / subscription Billing metrics (as stated on Aqua official site):

  • Dev Security: pricing based on number of code repositories.
  • Cloud Security: pricing based on number of workloads (AWS EC2 instances, Fargate containers, Lambda functions, etc.).

Free tier/trial (official):

  • Developer Plan: According to Aqua's SaaS EULA, after a limited evaluation period the account is converted and automatically renewed under Aqua’s Developer Plan ("free of charge").
  • Evaluation Period: Aqua's EULA states a 14-day Evaluation Period for trial (with possible extension at Aqua's discretion).

Public unit prices / example costs on vendor site:

  • No public per-unit prices, tiered dollar rates, or subscription fees are published on Aqua's official pricing page. Customers are directed to request a trial or demo / contact Aqua for pricing details.

Notes & official references:

  • Aqua’s public pricing page describes the pricing basis (repositories, workloads) and directs users to Request a Trial / Get Demo but does not list dollar amounts or public plan tiers on the page.
  • The EULA (Aqua SaaS) explicitly documents the 14-day evaluation and the Developer Plan conversion (free of charge) after the trial end, unless a commercial subscription is purchased.

Seller details

Aqua Security Software Ltd.
Ramat Gan, Israel
2015
Private
https://www.aquasec.com/
https://x.com/aquasec
https://www.linkedin.com/company/aqua-security-software-ltd/

Tools by Aqua Security Software Ltd.

Aqua Security
CloudSploit

Best Aqua Security alternatives

Wiz
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Aikido Security
ARMO Platform
See all alternatives

Popular categories

All categories