Jellyfish
Project-based ERP software
- Features
- Ease of use
- Ease of management
- Quality of support
- Affordability
- Market presence
Take the quiz to check if Jellyfish and its alternatives fit your requirements.
Contact the product provider
Free Trial unavailable
Free version
Small
Medium
Large
- Information technology and software
- Media and communications
- Professional services (engineering, legal, consulting, etc.)
What is Jellyfish
Jellyfish is an engineering management and analytics platform used to measure and manage software delivery work across tools such as issue trackers, code repositories, and CI/CD systems. It supports use cases like portfolio visibility, delivery forecasting, team capacity planning, and engineering KPI reporting for product and engineering leaders. The product focuses on aggregating development activity data and mapping it to initiatives, teams, and business outcomes rather than providing core ERP functions like general ledger, billing, or revenue recognition.
Strong engineering data aggregation
Jellyfish connects to common software development systems and consolidates work signals into a unified model for reporting. This reduces manual status collection across teams and tools. It is well-suited to organizations that need cross-team visibility into delivery progress and throughput. The approach is differentiated from project-based ERP systems that primarily center on finance-first project accounting.
Portfolio and delivery visibility
The platform supports initiative tracking and rollups across teams, enabling leadership-level views of progress and investment. It helps translate engineering activity into portfolio-level reporting for planning and prioritization. This can complement finance systems by providing operational delivery context. It is particularly relevant for software product organizations where work is managed in agile tooling.
Operational metrics and forecasting
Jellyfish provides engineering performance and delivery metrics intended for capacity and forecasting discussions. It can help standardize how teams report on flow, cycle time, and delivery health across the organization. This supports governance and continuous improvement programs. The focus is on operational analytics rather than accounting controls.
Not a full ERP system
Jellyfish does not replace project-based ERP capabilities such as general ledger, AP/AR, project billing, time and expense, or revenue recognition. Organizations still need a financial system of record for project accounting and compliance. Integrations may be required to align engineering delivery data with financial project structures. Buyers evaluating it as ERP software will likely find functional gaps.
Value depends on tool hygiene
The accuracy of reporting depends on consistent usage of connected tools (e.g., ticket fields, repository practices, and workflow states). If teams have inconsistent tagging, incomplete tickets, or divergent processes, dashboards can misrepresent progress. Implementation often requires governance and change management to standardize data definitions. This can extend time-to-value compared with systems that enforce structured financial transactions.
Limited non-engineering coverage
The product primarily models software engineering work and may not cover broader professional services needs such as resource scheduling across mixed disciplines, contract-based project accounting, or procurement workflows. Organizations with significant non-engineering project delivery may need additional systems for end-to-end project operations. Reporting may be less aligned to finance-led project hierarchies without customization. This can limit suitability for firms seeking a single system for project delivery and finance.
Seller details
Jellyfish, Inc.
Boston, MA, USA
2017
Private
https://www.jellyfish.co/
https://x.com/jellyfishco
https://www.linkedin.com/company/jellyfish-co/
