Qodo
Software testing tools
Secure code review software
Generative AI software
AI coding assistants software
DevSecOps software
AI APPSEC assistants
- Features
- Ease of use
- Ease of management
- Quality of support
- Affordability
- Market presence
Take the quiz to check if Qodo and its alternatives fit your requirements.
$30 per user per month
Free Trial unavailable
Free version
Small
Medium
Large
-
What is Qodo
Qodo is a generative-AI coding assistant focused on improving code quality through automated code review and test generation workflows. It targets software engineers and teams that want to accelerate pull request review, identify potential issues earlier, and generate unit tests as part of development. The product positions itself around code understanding and quality gates rather than end-user testing or UX research.
AI-assisted code review workflows
Qodo supports automated review of code changes to surface potential defects, style issues, and maintainability concerns during development. This aligns well with pull-request-centric workflows used in modern Git-based delivery. Compared with general testing tools, it focuses on developer feedback loops close to the code rather than post-deployment validation.
Test generation for developers
Qodo includes capabilities aimed at generating unit tests to increase coverage and reduce manual test authoring effort. This is useful for teams that struggle to keep tests in sync with frequent code changes. It complements traditional QA tooling by focusing on code-level tests rather than external, end-to-end testing services.
Security-oriented code insights
Qodo is positioned to support secure code review use cases by helping identify risky patterns and potential vulnerabilities during review. This can help shift security checks earlier in the SDLC, supporting DevSecOps practices. It is most relevant for engineering teams that want security context embedded into everyday coding and review activities.
Output requires human validation
As with generative AI coding tools, suggested fixes and generated tests can be incorrect, incomplete, or misaligned with project conventions. Teams typically need review standards to validate recommendations and prevent regressions. This can reduce time savings in complex codebases or highly regulated environments.
Not a full AppSec platform
Qodo’s AI-assisted review does not replace dedicated SAST/DAST, dependency scanning, SBOM management, or policy enforcement suites. Organizations with strict compliance requirements often need auditable rule sets, centralized reporting, and governance workflows beyond an assistant. Teams may still need separate tools for comprehensive application security coverage.
Integration depth varies by stack
Practical value depends on how well Qodo integrates with the team’s repositories, CI pipelines, IDEs, and ticketing processes. If supported languages, frameworks, or deployment models are limited, adoption can stall or require workarounds. Organizations should confirm coverage for their primary languages and PR workflows before standardizing.
Plan & Pricing
| Plan | Price | Key features & notes |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | $0 per month | 30 PRs free (limited-time promo), IDE plugin for local code review, CLI tool for agentic quality workflows, 75 credits for IDE/CLI per user, Community support via GitHub |
| Teams | $38 per user/month (monthly) or $30 per user/month (annual — Save 21%) | Optimized for collaboration; 20 PRs/user/month (limited-time promo: Unlimited PRs), IDE plugin, CLI tool, 2500 credits for IDE/CLI per user, Standard private support, No data retention & enhanced privacy |
| Enterprise | Contact us (custom pricing) | Enterprise dashboard & analytics, multi-repo context engine, enterprise user-admin & portal, MCP tools for Qodo agents, Enterprise SSO; deployment options: SaaS (single & multi-tenant), on-prem & air-gapped, proprietary self-hosted models; Priority support |
