fitgap

Infor Table Management

Features
Ease of use
Ease of management
Quality of support
Affordability
Market presence
Take the quiz to check if Infor Table Management and its alternatives fit your requirements.
Pricing from
Contact the product provider
Free Trial unavailable
Free version unavailable
User corporate size
Small
Medium
Large
User industry
  1. Accommodation and food services
  2. Education and training
  3. Transportation and logistics

What is Infor Table Management

Infor Table Management is a restaurant table and reservation management application used to plan seating, manage waitlists, and coordinate guest flow across dining areas. It is typically used by hosts, managers, and front-of-house teams in full-service restaurants and hospitality venues. The product focuses on floor plan-based table assignment and operational visibility rather than acting as a full point-of-sale system.

pros

Floor plan-based table control

Supports managing tables through visual floor plans to assign seating and track table status. This helps front-of-house teams coordinate turns, sections, and server coverage. It fits venues where table utilization and pacing are central to operations.

Waitlist and reservation workflows

Provides tools to manage reservations and walk-in waitlists in a single workflow. Hosts can track party size, timing, and seating readiness to reduce manual coordination. This is useful for high-volume service periods where guest flow changes quickly.

Designed for hospitality operations

Aligns with restaurant and hospitality front-of-house processes such as seating, pacing, and guest management. It can be positioned as a specialized module within broader hospitality technology stacks. This specialization can be beneficial for operators who do not want table management features bundled into a general-purpose tool.

cons

Narrow scope beyond FOH

The product centers on table, seating, and reservation operations and does not replace broader restaurant management capabilities like POS, online ordering, or delivery aggregation. Organizations may need additional systems for payments, menus, and kitchen workflows. This can increase integration and vendor management requirements.

Integration dependency for full stack

To deliver end-to-end reporting and operational workflows, it typically needs integration with POS, CRM/loyalty, and other hospitality systems. Integration availability and effort can vary by environment and existing systems. Implementation timelines may be longer than all-in-one restaurant platforms.

Limited public product transparency

Publicly available, detailed documentation and pricing information for this specific product can be harder to find than for many SMB-focused restaurant platforms. This can make early-stage evaluation and feature comparison more time-consuming. Buyers may need to rely on vendor-led demos and partner channels for specifics.

Seller details

Infor
New York, NY, USA
2002
Subsidiary
https://www.infor.com/
https://x.com/infor
https://www.linkedin.com/company/infor/

Tools by Infor

Infor M3
Infor LN
Infor SunSystems
Infor CloudSuite Corporate
Infor Dynamic Enterprise Performance Management
Infor F9
Infor Expense Management
Infor Production Scheduling
Infor SyteLine
Infor VISUAL
Infor XA
Infor LX
Infor Distribution SX.e
Infor System21
Infor MES
Infor Professional Services Automation Suite
Infor HCM
Infor Global Human Resources
Infor Talent Science
Infor LMS

Popular categories

All categories