fitgap

Plastic SCM

Features
Ease of use
Ease of management
Quality of support
Affordability
Market presence
Take the quiz to check if Plastic SCM and its alternatives fit your requirements.
Pricing from
Pay-as-you-go
Free Trial unavailable
Free version
User corporate size
Small
Medium
Large
User industry
-

What is Plastic SCM

Plastic SCM is a source code management and version control system designed for teams that need centralized or distributed workflows. It supports branching and merging and is commonly used in software development environments where large repositories or binary assets are involved. The product offers both self-hosted deployment and hosted options through the vendor’s services, with integrations typically used in CI/CD pipelines and developer tooling.

pros

Strong branching and merging model

Plastic SCM provides a branch-based workflow with merge and conflict resolution features aimed at parallel development. It supports both centralized and distributed modes, which can fit teams transitioning from older centralized tools or mixing workflows. Its GUI tooling is commonly used to visualize branches and changesets for day-to-day development. This can reduce reliance on command-line operations for routine SCM tasks.

Handles large and binary assets

Plastic SCM is often selected for repositories that include large files and binary assets alongside source code. It offers mechanisms intended to keep performance acceptable as repository size grows. This makes it a practical option for game development and other asset-heavy engineering teams. Compared with many Git-centric setups, it is frequently evaluated when binary workflows become a primary constraint.

Flexible deployment and access options

Plastic SCM supports on-premises installation as well as vendor-hosted services, enabling different security and compliance postures. It provides role-based access controls and repository-level administration suitable for team environments. Integrations and automation hooks can connect SCM events to build and release processes. This helps teams incorporate it into broader DevOps toolchains without replacing all surrounding systems.

cons

Smaller ecosystem than Git

Plastic SCM has fewer third-party integrations, community extensions, and standardized workflows than Git-based ecosystems. Some developer tools and platforms assume Git semantics and may require adapters or alternative processes. This can increase integration effort for organizations standardized on Git-native tooling. Teams may also find fewer community examples and troubleshooting resources.

Migration and workflow change effort

Moving from an established SCM (especially Git) can require repository migration, retraining, and updates to automation scripts. Branching, permissions, and review practices may need redesign to match Plastic SCM’s concepts and tooling. Organizations with many existing Git repositories can face operational overhead maintaining multiple SCM systems. These factors can slow adoption in large enterprises.

Hosting and licensing complexity

Depending on deployment choice (self-hosted vs hosted) and user counts, licensing and operational costs can be harder to forecast than purely open-source alternatives. Self-hosting adds infrastructure, backup, and upgrade responsibilities that some teams prefer to avoid. Hosted usage can introduce vendor dependency for availability and data residency requirements. Procurement and compliance reviews may be more involved than for widely standardized SCM platforms.

Plan & Pricing

Pricing model: Pay-as-you-go (monthly active users + team storage) Free tier: 1–3 monthly active users free; 0–5 GB cloud storage free (per organization). Pricing (users): From the 4th active user onward: $7 per active user per month. Pricing (storage, per organization): 0–5 GB free; 5–25 GB = $5 per team, per month; 25+ GB = $5 per every 25 GB increment, per team, per month. Example costs: 45 GB = $10/month; 120 GB = $25/month; 180 GB = $40/month. Notes: Active user definition: write to a repository (check-in, code review, create objects) or upload/download >=5 MB. This pricing applies to legacy Plastic SCM (not Unity DevOps) and is pay-as-you-go (invoices generated automatically based on active users and storage usage).

Seller details

Unity Software Inc.
San Francisco, CA, USA
2004
Public
https://unity.com/
https://x.com/unity
https://www.linkedin.com/company/unity-technologies/

Tools by Unity Software Inc.

Plastic SCM
SpeedTree for Games
Unity Ads
ironSource
Luna from Unity
Unity Reflect
AdQuality by IronSource
ironSource Aura
Multiplay
Supersonic
Unity

Best Plastic SCM alternatives

GitHub
AWS CodeCommit
P4
Gitea
See all alternatives

Popular categories

All categories