fitgap

Diligent Third-Party Risk Management

Features
Ease of use
Ease of management
Quality of support
Affordability
Market presence
Take the quiz to check if Diligent Third-Party Risk Management and its alternatives fit your requirements.
Pricing from
Contact the product provider
Free Trial unavailable
Free version unavailable
User corporate size
Small
Medium
Large
User industry
  1. Public sector and nonprofit organizations
  2. Agriculture, fishing, and forestry
  3. Professional services (engineering, legal, consulting, etc.)

What is Diligent Third-Party Risk Management

Diligent Third-Party Risk Management is a third-party risk management (TPRM) application used to assess, monitor, and document vendor security, privacy, and operational risks across the vendor lifecycle. It supports workflows such as onboarding due diligence, periodic reviews, issue remediation tracking, and reporting for internal stakeholders and auditors. The product is typically used by risk, compliance, information security, and procurement teams that need a centralized system of record for third-party assessments and controls evidence.

pros

Centralized vendor risk workflows

The product provides a structured system to manage third-party onboarding, assessments, approvals, and ongoing reviews in one place. This reduces reliance on email and spreadsheets for tracking questionnaires, findings, and remediation items. It also supports consistent execution of risk processes across business units and vendor types.

Assessment and evidence management

It supports collecting and organizing vendor responses and supporting documentation for security and privacy due diligence. Teams can use it to track gaps, assign follow-ups, and maintain an audit trail of decisions and actions. This is useful for demonstrating oversight during internal audits and external examinations.

Reporting for risk stakeholders

The product supports reporting on third-party risk posture, assessment status, and outstanding issues for management and governance stakeholders. This helps risk owners prioritize remediation and monitor program performance over time. It also supports standardized reporting across a portfolio of vendors.

cons

Implementation and process dependency

Value depends on having defined third-party risk processes, roles, and assessment standards before configuration. Organizations without mature TPRM governance may need additional internal work to standardize questionnaires, scoring, and escalation paths. Initial rollout can require change management across procurement, security, and business owners.

Integration scope varies by environment

Connecting TPRM workflows to procurement, contract lifecycle, ticketing, and GRC systems may require additional integration work depending on the organization’s tool stack. Data normalization for vendor records and risk taxonomies can take time. Some teams may still need manual steps to keep systems aligned if integrations are limited.

Not a full privacy operations suite

While it supports privacy-related vendor assessments, it is not primarily designed to run end-to-end privacy operations such as consent management, DSAR fulfillment, or cookie governance. Organizations with broad privacy automation requirements may need separate tooling for those functions. This can increase overall platform complexity for privacy programs.

Seller details

Diligent Corporation
New York, NY, USA
2001
Private
https://www.diligent.com/
https://x.com/diligentHQ
https://www.linkedin.com/company/diligent/

Tools by Diligent Corporation

Diligent Equity (formerly EquityEffect)
Diligent One Platform
Diligent Audit
Diligent Entities
Diligent ESG
Diligent Policy Manager
Diligent Compliance
Diligent Third-Party Risk Management
Activ
Diligent Manzama
Diligent
DiligentIQ
Diligent Boards
Diligent Community
BoardDocs

Best Diligent Third-Party Risk Management alternatives

OneTrust Privacy Automation
Venminder
ServiceNow Third-party Risk Management
SecurityScorecard
See all alternatives

Popular categories

All categories